MPredict anythingMIROFISH 米罗鱼
MiroFish 米罗鱼/Agent Simulations 智能体模拟
AI agent behavior, tool-use, and workflow rehearsal

Agent Simulations

Agent Simulations智能体模拟

Use Agent Simulations to rehearse how AI agents follow roles, use tools, share memory, hand off work, and expose behavior risks before an agent workflow is deployed.

Scenario / Simulation view
Agent simulation for an AI workflow 人工智能工作流的智能体模拟
3 rounds
R1
Primary agent 主智能体
Instruction frame is tested 指令框架被测试
R2
Tool and memory layer 工具与记忆层
Tool-use path branches 工具调用路径分叉
R3
Review or handoff agent 审核或交接智能体
Handoff risk appears 交接风险出现
Actors12+
Reaction paths24
Risk signals8
Inputs that make this useful

Bring evidence that gives the simulation a real boundary.

The best runs start with enough context for MiroFish to separate the decision, the actors, and the constraints.

Decision brief

Use the decision, memo, launch note, policy draft, pricing change, or scenario summary behind Agent Simulations.

Evidence notes

Add interviews, reports, support notes, competitor claims, public posts, or other context the actors should react to.

Constraint context

Include timing, audience, incentives, limits, and assumptions that should shape the simulated response.

Decision pressure this catches

See where the response starts to move.

Pressure 01

Instruction frame is tested

Watch how primary agent respond when this signal appears, then inspect whether the path needs more evidence.

Pressure 02

Tool-use path branches

Watch how tool and memory layer respond when this signal appears, then inspect whether the path needs more evidence.

Pressure 03

Handoff risk appears

Watch how review or handoff agent respond when this signal appears, then inspect whether the path needs more evidence.

Workflow

Turn a market question into a simulated response path.

Each use case page should show how MiroFish moves from seed material to actors, reactions, report structure, and follow-up questions.

Step 01

Frame the question

Define the agent workflow so the simulation starts with a concrete job.

Step 02

Map actors and incentives

Turn source material into actors, constraints, relationships, and the assumptions worth reviewing.

Step 03

Run reaction rounds

Let primary agent, tool and memory layer, review or handoff agent move through multiple rounds instead of compressing the answer into one guess.

Step 04

Read the next test

Use the report to find pressure signals, weak evidence, and the follow-up question that should be tested next.

Report Preview

The report makes pressure points visible.

Visitors should understand what they will inspect before they open the full MiroFish workspace.

Scenario report

Agent behavior map

  • First pressure signal
  • Actor movement
  • Assumptions to review

Tool-use risks

  • Reaction path
  • Objection cluster
  • Confidence boundary

Workflow next steps

  • Evidence to collect
  • Message to test
  • Follow-up prompt

What the report should answer

How to read the result.

  • Which agent simulations pressure signal appears first
  • Which actors amplify or redirect the path
  • Which assumption should be challenged before acting
  • Which follow-up question should be tested next

What it does not promise

Paths are not certainty.

  • Guaranteed revenue, vote share, scoreline, adoption, or public reaction
  • A substitute for customer research, field data, or accountable judgment
  • Live context unless you provide current source material
  • A final decision without reviewing the evidence boundary
Why structure matters

MiroFish gives the answer a shape you can inspect.

A normal chat answer can be useful, but this workflow makes the actors, reaction rounds, and assumptions easier to challenge.

Reasoning structure

Chatbot

One compressed answer

MiroFish

Actor graph and constraints

Reaction behavior

Chatbot

Advice summary

MiroFish

Multi-round paths

Reviewability

Chatbot

Hard to inspect after the answer

MiroFish

Report, assumptions, and follow-up questions

Open the workspace

Run this use case in MiroFish.

Start simulation
FAQ

Questions before the simulation

What is Agent Simulations AI for?+

It helps product, operations, automation, and AI teams rehearse how AI agents follow instructions, use tools, retain memory, hand off work, and fail before a workflow is deployed.

How is Agent Simulations different from Multi-Agent Simulation AI?+

Agent Simulations focuses on AI agent roles, tool use, memory, instructions, handoffs, and workflow failure modes. Multi-Agent Simulation AI focuses on how multiple actors influence one another around a scenario.

How is Agent Simulations different from Agent-Based Simulation AI?+

Agent-Based Simulation AI focuses on rule-based local behavior and aggregate system outcomes. Agent Simulations focuses on designing, stress-testing, and reviewing AI agent workflows before deployment.

What inputs work best for agent simulations?+

Use an agent prompt, workflow spec, tool list, memory policy, handoff rule, approval step, task transcript, failure report, or automation brief with the agent role and expected output clearly stated.

Can Agent Simulations test tool calling and handoff failures?+

Yes. Use it to rehearse tool-call paths, memory use, escalation rules, review steps, handoff timing, and failure modes so teams can find workflow risks before an AI agent reaches production.